All of the current streaming services use pretty much standardized protocols for upstream.
Why don't you just ditch the horrible, useless, money grubbing, cancerous IBM Ustream and let users configure the upsteam freely? Perhaps even adding presets for popular ones like Youtube and Twitch?
The ustream exclusivity seems completelly unnecesary and hinderance for you customers.
I'm a member of a facebook page about the Sony a6300, with many a6300 owners. I took time watching reviews, and consulting customer's feedback. I came here to talk for them, and I may edit, add suggestions on this post.
The overheat warning isn't as much present as it was since the last firmware update, so I removed the suggestion.
1- Improve 1080p
The a6300 4K capabilities are amazing, but many want to avoid rolling shutter, or to shoot S35 30/50/60/120p. To be honest, unless sticking the camera on a tripod, or for very slow movements, the 4K mode is hardly usable and makes the footage jerky. So we have to stick with 1080p. But the a6300's 1080p is bad. It's not even as good as it's little brother the a6000. It's not acceptable since it should be an upgrade from it. The a6300's processor is a beast, I guess the processing power shouldn't be a problem. The Fujifilm X-Pro2 that isn't a movie-mode oriented camera, has the same CMOS and has an amazing 1080p quality, less moiré, less noise.
The A7RII offers even better 1080p, and has far more pixels to process. The implementations of it's algorithm in the a6300 shouldn't be such a big deal. Therefore, giving us a far superior 1080p seems realistic.
a6000 vs a6300 (click)
Now let's talk about the noise:
4K has far less noise than 1080p with the same settings. The noise patern is better. Here a comparaison with both at ISO800, 24p, Slog-3. Why can't we get the same noise performance in 1080p?
We also would love also to get a higher bitrate (is 100mbits possible?) to reduce the color noise we get when grading LOG footage.
2- Many other suggestions!
- Bigger histogram. Exposure metter that's more readable. It's locked to -2 and +2, that's not enough.
- Being able to use it as a webcam, to record directly on the computer (as a capture device) into premiere. It's great for creating content, but may be hardware-limited :/.
- Try to reduce the rolling shutter in 4K mode (I guess Sony is aware of this and it's not possible...).
- Get rid of the NTSC/PAL warning, or show all modes without having to stuck to only PAL or only NTSC
- Being able to see what is ISO value when shooting with AUTO-ISO.
- Add other customisable functions, ex: iso up/down, focus up/down.
- Being able ton set custom Zoom Speed with RM-VPR1 remote. Right now with 18 105 I can't access the "zoom" menu, and the zoom speed is veeeeery slow. So I can't change it remotly.
- Being able to custom W/T buttons, and the shutter and rec buttons. So when using the RM-VPR1 remote, it could be used for other functions, example: pull focus up or down, change ISO or aputure values, etc. Would be AMAZING when used on a gimbal.
- Let us use all AF fonctionalities when recording a video. It's so frustration to be forced to either AF manually or let the camera do it all! Why not let us use DMF mode?
- Save Custom Functions in the Memory Profiles
- Regroup all video functions on one page in the menus
- Fix the markers; they doesn't match what's in the EVF when recording
- Place "Format" function in a more convenient place
- Being able to send only one picture to our PC directly from the camera. Not having to sync all the pictures.
- Enable continuous af & eye af while shooting in hi speed
- Improve the compatibility with A-mount lenses:
Lock on expandable flexible spot while using the la-ea3 adapter
Drive Mode HI+ not available in AF-C mode
- Improve adapters stability with A mount. Not normal that Sigma's MC-11 is more reliable than Sony's adapter
- Being able to control the EVF sensor (more details in the comments). Idea already suggested here for the A7RII. Would benefit all the Alpha line.
- When using slog picture profiles, we have to over expose by 1 to 2 stop, in order to get a descent image quality. We'd like to see a exposure meter that is also reliable when used with s-log, so without having the need to over-expose.
3- Remote app improvement detailed -tested last app version 22/04/2016-
The a6300 doesn't have a touchscreen, but it has Wifi and can be used via Playmemories app. So it can be controled via our phone and tablets. The app have recently vastly been improved. So I will only cover the video part of this, since it's near perfect for photography. It seems that the Playmemories app isn't as good as it could/should be for video.
Latency is ok ! Latency with an iPad, is very low, and satisfaying.
- Get everything out of the way. Nothing function should be layered on top of the video feed (especially that W/T function!)
- Being able to see focus peaking
- Being able to see Zebras
- Being able to shoot in Slog/with picture profiles
- Full screen page with settings/light meter/histogram with the ability to tap and drag a setting to change it on the fly, in a more simple way. Being able to change not only aperture and shutter, but also picture profile, audio levels, and so on. It would be really useful when on a gimbal or a drone; the camera can hardly be manipulated to set it up.
- Being able to personalise this setting page like the a6300 allow us already
- Being able to get the video feedback through USB for less latency, both on PC/MAC and ANDROID/IOS. Canon's does that. Would basically makes any Ipad/tablets, a better monitoring screen than anything on the market. Fortunately Sony doesn't sell those. So...
Expanding video possibilities via wifi would please all videographers, since everyone has at least a smartphone, and every videographer would be happy to make it's phone useful in any way possible. Many competitors aren't there yet, so make the step first.
Thanks for reading and we appreciate that Sony is concerned by it's custommer experience.
I read an interview which is done with Kimio Maki, Senior General Manager of the Digital Imaging Business Group a few days ago during Photokina 2016.
Mr.Maki said: "It’s usually a request from our general customers, however it’s not a request that we get from professionals. We may have to add touchscreen panels to our entry-level models, but professionals don’t require it. If the professionals change their mind and put in the request we may need to change this in the future."
Well, I think the comsumer survey they've done needs an update. Professionals surely do require it. It's right that you need to change.
Here're the professional and enthusiast cameras implemented with touchscreen published lately:
Canon 1DX Mark II (not fully functioned)
Canon 5D Mark IV
Canon EOS M5 (with touchpad AF function)
Nikon D5500 (with touchpad AF function)
All M43 Cameras (with touchpad AF function in Panasonic cameras)
Fuji GFX 50S
I guess the users of the cameras above are professional enough.
Here're the ones without a touchscreen:
Sony A7R2, A7S2, RX1R2, A6300
Sony A99 Mark II
Ususally Sony won't show up in the "without" list when it comes to untraditional features.
Now let's see opinions of people who are considered as professionals.
A7R2 is highly rated in DPR, but this is what they thought the biggest drawback of it, so do many users:
“No direct access to AF point selection is bordering on inexcusable for a camera of this class: first pressing a button and then using a mushy 4-way dial to move the AF point is cumbersome. A touchscreen could've helped, especially if it functioned while using the viewfinder like the Nikon D5500 (so as EOS M5 and Panasonic Cameras), but alas, there is none.”
What DPR staffs think about EOS M5:
"In fact it's the implementation of this touchscreen that we're most impressed with. Much like the system developed by Panasonic, the M5 not only lets you use the rear touchscreen to position focus, it also allows its use as a touchpad to move the focus point, when you're shooting through the viewfinder. This, combined with decisive autofocus, should be really significant for both stills and video shooting."
They also regard touchscreen with Dual-Pixel AF as one of the most significant features of 5D Mark IV:
"You can use the touchscreen to navigate menus, access options on (and populate) the Q menu, and perhaps most importantly, touch-to-focus in both video and stills Live View. And if you don't want or need it, you can disable it altogether. As for us, we like it, and using speedy and accurate touch-to-focus on a rear screen instead of laying on our stomachs in the dirt for a low-angle shot is always an added plus."
This is Canon's official opinion on the touchscreen of 5D Mark IV:
"In the past, touchscreen operations on a high-end camera might have been looked at skeptically by traditional, experienced SLR shooters. After all, if we’ve evolved from relatively simply 35mm film SLRs to today’s sophisticated digital SLRs, using buttons and dials, why change a good thing?
But as mentioned in our opening, even the most tradition-bound camera user probably uses a touch-based interface regularly, when he or she pulls out their smartphone or mobile device. We’re all more accustomed to this type of immediate, tactile input (well, nearly all of us!). Canon has a track record of excellent touchscreen design in more consumer-oriented cameras, and that technology and its convenience has trickled up the food chain, to the EOS 5D Mark IV. Unlike the recently-introduced EOS-1D X Mark II (our top-of-the-line, professional DSLR), the 5D Mark IV is blessed with the full touchscreen interface, and all the attendant options. We’re confident that new EOS 5D Mark IV users who give it a try will find it really can help speed up some of their menu selections when examining images during playback. We certainly urge anyone thinking of trying out this camera to give the touchscreen interface a test drive!"
improvephotography.com's opinion on Fuji X-T2 not having a touchscreen:
"Cameras need a touch screen. I used to think I wouldn’t use a touchscreen on a camera until I got one that had it, and suddenly it was the only way I wanted to control the camera."
cameralabs.com's opinion on Fuji X-T2 not having a touchscreen:
"Just below the thumb dial you'll find an AF joystick again inherited from the X-Pro2 which makes it much quicker and easier to reposition the AF area; admittedly not as quick and easy as a touchscreen would…. and in my view touchscreens would greatly enhance all X-bodies; Fujifilm has already proven they can do touch controls well with the X70."
There're also thousands of complaining threads in professional and enthusiast forums. Here're some examples:
Why is Sony so reluctant about touchscreen?
Sony Needs to Make it Quicker to Change Focus Areas
Serious question - what's the a7rII missing?
Thought on touch screen implemented in the 5D Mk IV?
So, I think I've already made my point clear.
Professionals DO need touchscreen! Please add it to your next high-end camera!
Many people feel Sony is the best when it comes to camera sensors.
Whenever Sony comes up with a new camera, sometimes they receive firmware updates to correct bugs, add features, etc.
Problem is, such firmware support is time limited, as any time Sony brings out a new camera, the preceding model gets forgottgen and no more new updates seem to show up.
People see that as Sony just wanting to pump out more bodies. People understand that you need to make your profits, but many potential buyers consider after sales support essential, and part of such support includes constant, timely and useful firmware updates.
So, please, provide better long term firmware support for all cameras, current and future.
Thanks for your time.
really, the a5100 wich is her little sister, has it, and a6000 no?
i just ordered an a6000 on amazon 2 days ago, then i read about 5100 wich seems better for this and touch screen? do i really need to send it back to amazon? i really like it...
please, update firmware with XAVC-S support, on some video based reviews, reviewers blame the avhcd codec... and i'm sure there's no hardware problem... same sensor, same cpu, same hardware etc.
I was wondering if/when the A7/A7R will receive the firmware update for XAVC-S and/or S-LOG 2 for video?
The RX10 has received the XAVC-S codec, and has the same BIONZ-X processor... I don't think it is a heat issue if it couldn't as the A7S is the same size body and can do even more (S-LOG2, 4k, higher bitrates...)
Right now, AVCHD just doesn't cut it, and an update wouldn't take any market away from the A7S (A7S has a better sensor, low light, etc) even just a higher bitrate at XAVC-S would mean the world.
Thanks and cheers,
Review our submission guidelines before getting started