Skip to the end of navigation

Welcome to the Community!

Join the Inspiration

Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Do you mean 
Share Your Idea

Lossless RAW for A7R, A7S, A7, A6000

by mb2015 Rookie ‎12-19-2015 09:05 AM - edited ‎12-19-2015 10:22 AM

Firmware update request:


Please add the lossless RAW format option also to the Sony A7R, A7S, A7


Thank you from an A7R owner. 

I just heard that many of the non-native Sony lens (i.e., SIgma, Tamron, etc) are non working properly on the Sony A99II. How true is this? I'm a A99 owner who have really considered purchasing the Sony A99II; but am very concerned with this considering that I have several non-native lens.

It would be great to have an aspect ratio of 4:3 for stills, and not only 3:2 and 16:9.


4:3 is a classic aspect ratio, especially for fields like architectural photography. Also, images shot in portrait orientation tend to look more harmonic in 4:3.






really, the a5100 wich is her little sister, has it, and a6000 no? 

i just ordered an a6000 on amazon 2 days ago, then i read about 5100 wich seems better for this and touch screen? do i really need to send it back to amazon? i really like it...


please, update firmware with XAVC-S support, on some video based reviews, reviewers blame the avhcd codec... and i'm sure there's no hardware problem... same sensor, same cpu, same hardware etc.




Considering how the Electronic First Curtain Shutter affects bokeh at certain shutter speeds and how it affects HSS can you please either allow the option to be assigned to a button or even better allow us to set a speed where EFCS is automatically disabled.



A7Rii user here! 

I was wondering if/when the A7/A7R will receive the firmware update for XAVC-S and/or S-LOG 2 for video?


The RX10 has received the XAVC-S codec, and has the same BIONZ-X processor... I don't think it is a heat issue if it couldn't as the A7S is the same size body and can do even more (S-LOG2, 4k, higher bitrates...)


Right now, AVCHD just doesn't cut it, and an update wouldn't take any market away from the A7S (A7S has a better sensor, low light, etc) even just a higher bitrate at XAVC-S would mean the world.


Thanks and cheers,


Jason Zeis


Custom Button assignment for the a7ii

by PSikes Rookie ‎01-24-2017 12:35 PM - edited ‎01-24-2017 12:36 PM

Please allow assignment of the Finder/Monitor option to a custom button for the A7ii.


It's been available for the A7R series for some time.  It can be done!  How about version 3.40?

It is important that your Alpha series (for sure the A7ii, maybe others) have better range finding and focusing support on-screen, like so:


  1. Be able to toggle the focal distance indicator between Meters and Feet (aka Imperial units). Currently the firmware ONLY supports Meters.
  2. When it is in meters, the on-screen the distance indicator should be improved by showing partial meters (tenths in decimal units)


This will improve the Alpha series’ ability to focus on more-precise distances, helpful to many areas of general photography.


Here is why... like many, I enjoy shooting travel, street and sometimes photo-journalism photos.  These are not uncommon photographic styles, and they frequently use the following techniques:


   a. Zone focusing

   b. Hyperfocal distance shooting


Other types of photography use these techniques also, especially if you need to take pictures quickly.  Both techniques involve selecting a specific 'manual' focal distance and doing point-and-shoot photography, trusting that subjects will be in focus if they reside between your Depth-of-Focus NEAR and FAR limits.  There are many advantages to this common technique, the obvious one being that photos are more reliably and predictably in focus while taking fast shots of (often) not-centered subjects.


Sadly, I find that the Alpha 7ii does not facilitate this well AT ALL.  Surprising for an otherwise all-around good camera.


Specifically, with the current Sony equipment I cannot accurately focus to the exact distance I want (say: "12 feet”) because the Sony/Zeiss lenses are fly-by-wire focus systems and rely mostly on on-screen user interface cues to get subjects in focus (e.g., a digital range indicator and focus peaking).  


The biggest offender, in my opinion, is the current distance indicator, which shows only 'whole' meters... e.g. 2m >> 3mm >> 4mm etc.  And the distance indicator is a sliding scale between each value… but I find it is hard to see if you are focusing on, for example, 2.2 meters (7.2 feet) or 2.6 meters (8.5 feet) because, as I understand it, the scale isn't linear.  And even if it was linear, it's hard to eyeball.  Note that in the U.S. market, for one, many photographers prefer to eyeball in imperial units, not metric.  Anyway, in photography the difference in a few feet can be extremely important and can ruin shots you thought would be in focus.


For those that state that Focus Peaking might help here, I would argue that it is not a good fit for zone focusing.  Photographers still need a subject at a fairly specific distance to focus on.  There are numerous apps (like PhotoPills) and web-based calculators that will help you define your ideal focal plane distance.  With the current Alpha cameras, I have two inconvenient alternatives for focusing on those distances: picking objects with a third party range finder or just eyeballing.  And if the subject is not properly lit, thus offering enough contrast, focus peaking isn’t as helpful.


In summary: for zone focusing and hyperfocal to work best, you want to set your camera to focus at a specific distance.  Many other cameras make this easier because the distance index scale is ‘notched’ onto the outside ring of the lens itself.  Because the Sony Alpha relies on firmware and computer-screen UI, I would ask that you improve the UI to include the two important changes mentioned above.  


  1. With feet (imperial units) some of us are better at judging distances in feet and can be more accurate… and


  1. in meters it will greatly help if we can see on screen when a lens is focused at 2.2 meters vs. 2.6 etc. through the use of a decimal fraction (tenths place should be sufficient).  


Thank you.